Technical reports
Are timestamps worth the effort?
A formal treatment
Giampaolo Bella, Lawrence C. Paulson
September 1998, 12 pages
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.48456/tr-447 |
Abstract
Theorem proving provides formal and detailed support to the claim that timestamps can give better freshness guarantees than nonces do, and can simplify the design of crypto-protocols. However, since they rely on synchronised clocks, their benefits are still debatable. The debate should gain from our formal analysis, which is achieved through the comparison of a nonce-based crypto-protocol, Needham-Schroeder, with its natural modification by timestamps, Kerberos.
Full text
PDF (0.7 MB)
BibTeX record
@TechReport{UCAM-CL-TR-447,
author = {Bella, Giampaolo and Paulson, Lawrence C.},
title = {{Are timestamps worth the effort? A formal treatment}},
year = 1998,
month = sep,
url = {https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-447.pdf},
institution = {University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory},
doi = {10.48456/tr-447},
number = {UCAM-CL-TR-447}
}