Theory Totient
section ‹Fundamental facts about Euler's totient function›
theory Totient
imports
Complex_Main
"HOL-Computational_Algebra.Primes"
Cong
begin
definition totatives :: "nat ⇒ nat set" where
"totatives n = {k ∈ {0<..n}. coprime k n}"
lemma in_totatives_iff: "k ∈ totatives n ⟷ k > 0 ∧ k ≤ n ∧ coprime k n"
by (simp add: totatives_def)
lemma totatives_code [code]: "totatives n = Set.filter (λk. coprime k n) {0<..n}"
by (simp add: totatives_def Set.filter_def)
lemma finite_totatives [simp]: "finite (totatives n)"
by (simp add: totatives_def)
lemma totatives_subset: "totatives n ⊆ {0<..n}"
by (auto simp: totatives_def)
lemma zero_not_in_totatives [simp]: "0 ∉ totatives n"
by (auto simp: totatives_def)
lemma totatives_le: "x ∈ totatives n ⟹ x ≤ n"
by (auto simp: totatives_def)
lemma totatives_less:
assumes "x ∈ totatives n" "n > 1"
shows "x < n"
proof -
from assms have "x ≠ n" by (auto simp: totatives_def)
with totatives_le[OF assms(1)] show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma totatives_0 [simp]: "totatives 0 = {}"
by (auto simp: totatives_def)
lemma totatives_1 [simp]: "totatives 1 = {Suc 0}"
by (auto simp: totatives_def)
lemma totatives_Suc_0 [simp]: "totatives (Suc 0) = {Suc 0}"
by (auto simp: totatives_def)
lemma one_in_totatives [simp]: "n > 0 ⟹ Suc 0 ∈ totatives n"
by (auto simp: totatives_def)
lemma totatives_eq_empty_iff [simp]: "totatives n = {} ⟷ n = 0"
using one_in_totatives[of n] by (auto simp del: one_in_totatives)
lemma minus_one_in_totatives:
assumes "n ≥ 2"
shows "n - 1 ∈ totatives n"
using assms coprime_diff_one_left_nat [of n] by (simp add: in_totatives_iff)
lemma power_in_totatives:
assumes "m > 1" "coprime m g"
shows "g ^ i mod m ∈ totatives m"
proof -
have "¬m dvd g ^ i"
proof
assume "m dvd g ^ i"
hence "¬coprime m (g ^ i)"
using ‹m > 1› by (subst coprime_absorb_left) auto
with ‹coprime m g› show False by simp
qed
with assms show ?thesis
by (auto simp: totatives_def coprime_commute intro!: Nat.gr0I)
qed
lemma totatives_prime_power_Suc:
assumes "prime p"
shows "totatives (p ^ Suc n) = {0<..p^Suc n} - (λm. p * m) ` {0<..p^n}"
proof safe
fix m assume m: "p * m ∈ totatives (p ^ Suc n)" and m: "m ∈ {0<..p^n}"
thus False using assms by (auto simp: totatives_def gcd_mult_left)
next
fix k assume k: "k ∈ {0<..p^Suc n}" "k ∉ (λm. p * m) ` {0<..p^n}"
from k have "¬(p dvd k)" by (auto elim!: dvdE)
hence "coprime k (p ^ Suc n)"
using prime_imp_coprime [OF assms, of k]
by (cases "n > 0") (auto simp add: ac_simps)
with k show "k ∈ totatives (p ^ Suc n)" by (simp add: totatives_def)
qed (auto simp: totatives_def)
lemma totatives_prime: "prime p ⟹ totatives p = {0<..<p}"
using totatives_prime_power_Suc [of p 0] by auto
lemma bij_betw_totatives:
assumes "m1 > 1" "m2 > 1" "coprime m1 m2"
shows "bij_betw (λx. (x mod m1, x mod m2)) (totatives (m1 * m2))
(totatives m1 × totatives m2)"
unfolding bij_betw_def
proof
show "inj_on (λx. (x mod m1, x mod m2)) (totatives (m1 * m2))"
proof (intro inj_onI, clarify)
fix x y assume xy: "x ∈ totatives (m1 * m2)" "y ∈ totatives (m1 * m2)"
"x mod m1 = y mod m1" "x mod m2 = y mod m2"
have ex: "∃!z. z < m1 * m2 ∧ [z = x] (mod m1) ∧ [z = x] (mod m2)"
by (rule binary_chinese_remainder_unique_nat) (insert assms, simp_all)
have "x < m1 * m2 ∧ [x = x] (mod m1) ∧ [x = x] (mod m2)"
"y < m1 * m2 ∧ [y = x] (mod m1) ∧ [y = x] (mod m2)"
using xy assms by (simp_all add: totatives_less one_less_mult cong_def)
from this[THEN the1_equality[OF ex]] show "x = y" by simp
qed
next
show "(λx. (x mod m1, x mod m2)) ` totatives (m1 * m2) = totatives m1 × totatives m2"
proof safe
fix x assume "x ∈ totatives (m1 * m2)"
with assms show "x mod m1 ∈ totatives m1" "x mod m2 ∈ totatives m2"
using coprime_common_divisor [of x m1 m1] coprime_common_divisor [of x m2 m2]
by (auto simp add: in_totatives_iff mod_greater_zero_iff_not_dvd)
next
fix a b assume ab: "a ∈ totatives m1" "b ∈ totatives m2"
with assms have ab': "a < m1" "b < m2" by (auto simp: totatives_less)
with binary_chinese_remainder_unique_nat[OF assms(3), of a b] obtain x
where x: "x < m1 * m2" "x mod m1 = a" "x mod m2 = b" by (auto simp: cong_def)
from x ab assms(3) have "x ∈ totatives (m1 * m2)"
by (auto intro: ccontr simp add: in_totatives_iff)
with x show "(a, b) ∈ (λx. (x mod m1, x mod m2)) ` totatives (m1*m2)" by blast
qed
qed
lemma bij_betw_totatives_gcd_eq:
fixes n d :: nat
assumes "d dvd n" "n > 0"
shows "bij_betw (λk. k * d) (totatives (n div d)) {k∈{0<..n}. gcd k n = d}"
unfolding bij_betw_def
proof
show "inj_on (λk. k * d) (totatives (n div d))"
by (auto simp: inj_on_def)
next
show "(λk. k * d) ` totatives (n div d) = {k∈{0<..n}. gcd k n = d}"
proof (intro equalityI subsetI, goal_cases)
case (1 k)
then show ?case using assms
by (auto elim: dvdE simp add: in_totatives_iff ac_simps gcd_mult_right)
next
case (2 k)
hence "d dvd k" by auto
then obtain l where k: "k = l * d" by (elim dvdE) auto
from 2 assms show ?case
using gcd_mult_right [of _ d l]
by (auto intro: gcd_eq_1_imp_coprime elim!: dvdE simp add: k image_iff in_totatives_iff ac_simps)
qed
qed
definition totient :: "nat ⇒ nat" where
"totient n = card (totatives n)"
primrec totient_naive :: "nat ⇒ nat ⇒ nat ⇒ nat" where
"totient_naive 0 acc n = acc"
| "totient_naive (Suc k) acc n =
(if coprime (Suc k) n then totient_naive k (acc + 1) n else totient_naive k acc n)"
lemma totient_naive:
"totient_naive k acc n = card {x ∈ {0<..k}. coprime x n} + acc"
proof (induction k arbitrary: acc)
case (Suc k acc)
have "totient_naive (Suc k) acc n =
(if coprime (Suc k) n then 1 else 0) + card {x ∈ {0<..k}. coprime x n} + acc"
using Suc by simp
also have "(if coprime (Suc k) n then 1 else 0) =
card (if coprime (Suc k) n then {Suc k} else {})" by auto
also have "… + card {x ∈ {0<..k}. coprime x n} =
card ((if coprime (Suc k) n then {Suc k} else {}) ∪ {x ∈ {0<..k}. coprime x n})"
by (intro card_Un_disjoint [symmetric]) auto
also have "((if coprime (Suc k) n then {Suc k} else {}) ∪ {x ∈ {0<..k}. coprime x n}) =
{x ∈ {0<..Suc k}. coprime x n}" by (auto elim: le_SucE)
finally show ?case .
qed simp_all
lemma totient_code_naive [code]: "totient n = totient_naive n 0 n"
by (subst totient_naive) (simp add: totient_def totatives_def)
lemma totient_le: "totient n ≤ n"
proof -
have "card (totatives n) ≤ card {0<..n}"
by (intro card_mono) (auto simp: totatives_def)
thus ?thesis by (simp add: totient_def)
qed
lemma totient_less:
assumes "n > 1"
shows "totient n < n"
proof -
from assms have "card (totatives n) ≤ card {0<..<n}"
using totatives_less[of _ n] totatives_subset[of n] by (intro card_mono) auto
with assms show ?thesis by (simp add: totient_def)
qed
lemma totient_0 [simp]: "totient 0 = 0"
by (simp add: totient_def)
lemma totient_Suc_0 [simp]: "totient (Suc 0) = Suc 0"
by (simp add: totient_def)
lemma totient_1 [simp]: "totient 1 = Suc 0"
by simp
lemma totient_0_iff [simp]: "totient n = 0 ⟷ n = 0"
by (auto simp: totient_def)
lemma totient_gt_0_iff [simp]: "totient n > 0 ⟷ n > 0"
by (auto intro: Nat.gr0I)
lemma totient_gt_1:
assumes "n > 2"
shows "totient n > 1"
proof -
have "{1, n - 1} ⊆ totatives n"
using assms coprime_diff_one_left_nat[of n] by (auto simp: totatives_def)
hence "card {1, n - 1} ≤ card (totatives n)"
by (intro card_mono) auto
thus ?thesis using assms
by (simp add: totient_def)
qed
lemma card_gcd_eq_totient:
"n > 0 ⟹ d dvd n ⟹ card {k∈{0<..n}. gcd k n = d} = totient (n div d)"
unfolding totient_def by (rule sym, rule bij_betw_same_card[OF bij_betw_totatives_gcd_eq])
lemma totient_divisor_sum: "(∑d | d dvd n. totient d) = n"
proof (cases "n = 0")
case False
hence "n > 0" by simp
define A where "A = (λd. {k∈{0<..n}. gcd k n = d})"
have *: "card (A d) = totient (n div d)" if d: "d dvd n" for d
using ‹n > 0› and d unfolding A_def by (rule card_gcd_eq_totient)
have "n = card {1..n}" by simp
also have "{1..n} = (⋃d∈{d. d dvd n}. A d)" by safe (auto simp: A_def)
also have "card … = (∑d | d dvd n. card (A d))"
using ‹n > 0› by (intro card_UN_disjoint) (auto simp: A_def)
also have "… = (∑d | d dvd n. totient (n div d))" by (intro sum.cong refl *) auto
also have "… = (∑d | d dvd n. totient d)" using ‹n > 0›
by (intro sum.reindex_bij_witness[of _ "(div) n" "(div) n"]) (auto elim: dvdE)
finally show ?thesis ..
qed auto
lemma totient_mult_coprime:
assumes "coprime m n"
shows "totient (m * n) = totient m * totient n"
proof (cases "m > 1 ∧ n > 1")
case True
hence mn: "m > 1" "n > 1" by simp_all
have "totient (m * n) = card (totatives (m * n))" by (simp add: totient_def)
also have "… = card (totatives m × totatives n)"
using bij_betw_totatives [OF mn ‹coprime m n›] by (rule bij_betw_same_card)
also have "… = totient m * totient n" by (simp add: totient_def)
finally show ?thesis .
next
case False
with assms show ?thesis by (cases m; cases n) auto
qed
lemma totient_prime_power_Suc:
assumes "prime p"
shows "totient (p ^ Suc n) = p ^ n * (p - 1)"
proof -
from assms have "totient (p ^ Suc n) = card ({0<..p ^ Suc n} - (*) p ` {0<..p ^ n})"
unfolding totient_def by (subst totatives_prime_power_Suc) simp_all
also from assms have "… = p ^ Suc n - card ((*) p ` {0<..p^n})"
by (subst card_Diff_subset) (auto intro: prime_gt_0_nat)
also from assms have "card ((*) p ` {0<..p^n}) = p ^ n"
by (subst card_image) (auto simp: inj_on_def)
also have "p ^ Suc n - p ^ n = p ^ n * (p - 1)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma totient_prime_power:
assumes "prime p" "n > 0"
shows "totient (p ^ n) = p ^ (n - 1) * (p - 1)"
using totient_prime_power_Suc[of p "n - 1"] assms by simp
lemma totient_imp_prime:
assumes "totient p = p - 1" "p > 0"
shows "prime p"
proof (cases "p = 1")
case True
with assms show ?thesis by auto
next
case False
with assms have p: "p > 1" by simp
have "x ∈ {0<..<p}" if "x ∈ totatives p" for x
using that and p by (cases "x = p") (auto simp: totatives_def)
with assms have *: "totatives p = {0<..<p}"
by (intro card_subset_eq) (auto simp: totient_def)
have **: False if "x ≠ 1" "x ≠ p" "x dvd p" for x
proof -
from that have nz: "x ≠ 0" by (auto intro!: Nat.gr0I)
from that and p have le: "x ≤ p" by (intro dvd_imp_le) auto
from that and nz have "¬coprime x p"
by (auto elim: dvdE)
hence "x ∉ totatives p" by (simp add: totatives_def)
also note *
finally show False using that and le by auto
qed
hence "(∀m. m dvd p ⟶ m = 1 ∨ m = p)" by blast
with p show ?thesis by (subst prime_nat_iff) (auto dest: **)
qed
lemma totient_prime:
assumes "prime p"
shows "totient p = p - 1"
using totient_prime_power_Suc[of p 0] assms by simp
lemma totient_2 [simp]: "totient 2 = 1"
and totient_3 [simp]: "totient 3 = 2"
and totient_5 [simp]: "totient 5 = 4"
and totient_7 [simp]: "totient 7 = 6"
by (subst totient_prime; simp)+
lemma totient_4 [simp]: "totient 4 = 2"
and totient_8 [simp]: "totient 8 = 4"
and totient_9 [simp]: "totient 9 = 6"
using totient_prime_power[of 2 2] totient_prime_power[of 2 3] totient_prime_power[of 3 2]
by simp_all
lemma totient_6 [simp]: "totient 6 = 2"
using totient_mult_coprime [of 2 3] coprime_add_one_right [of 2]
by simp
lemma totient_even:
assumes "n > 2"
shows "even (totient n)"
proof (cases "∃p. prime p ∧ p ≠ 2 ∧ p dvd n")
case True
then obtain p where p: "prime p" "p ≠ 2" "p dvd n" by auto
from ‹p ≠ 2› have "p = 0 ∨ p = 1 ∨ p > 2" by auto
with p(1) have "odd p" using prime_odd_nat[of p] by auto
define k where "k = multiplicity p n"
from p assms have k_pos: "k > 0" unfolding k_def by (subst multiplicity_gt_zero_iff) auto
have "p ^ k dvd n" unfolding k_def by (simp add: multiplicity_dvd)
then obtain m where m: "n = p ^ k * m" by (elim dvdE)
with assms have m_pos: "m > 0" by (auto intro!: Nat.gr0I)
from k_def m_pos p have "¬ p dvd m"
by (subst (asm) m) (auto intro!: Nat.gr0I simp: prime_elem_multiplicity_mult_distrib
prime_elem_multiplicity_eq_zero_iff)
with ‹prime p› have "coprime p m"
by (rule prime_imp_coprime)
with ‹k > 0› have "coprime (p ^ k) m"
by simp
then show ?thesis using p k_pos ‹odd p›
by (auto simp add: m totient_mult_coprime totient_prime_power)
next
case False
from assms have "n = (∏p∈prime_factors n. p ^ multiplicity p n)"
by (intro Primes.prime_factorization_nat) auto
also from False have "… = (∏p∈prime_factors n. if p = 2 then 2 ^ multiplicity 2 n else 1)"
by (intro prod.cong refl) auto
also have "… = 2 ^ multiplicity 2 n"
by (subst prod.delta[OF finite_set_mset]) (auto simp: prime_factors_multiplicity)
finally have n: "n = 2 ^ multiplicity 2 n" .
have "multiplicity 2 n = 0 ∨ multiplicity 2 n = 1 ∨ multiplicity 2 n > 1" by force
with n assms have "multiplicity 2 n > 1" by auto
thus ?thesis by (subst n) (simp add: totient_prime_power)
qed
lemma totient_prod_coprime:
assumes "pairwise coprime (f ` A)" "inj_on f A"
shows "totient (prod f A) = (∏a∈A. totient (f a))"
using assms
proof (induction A rule: infinite_finite_induct)
case (insert x A)
have *: "coprime (prod f A) (f x)"
proof (rule prod_coprime_left)
fix y
assume "y ∈ A"
with ‹x ∉ A› have "y ≠ x"
by auto
with ‹x ∉ A› ‹y ∈ A› ‹inj_on f (insert x A)› have "f y ≠ f x"
using inj_onD [of f "insert x A" y x]
by auto
with ‹y ∈ A› show "coprime (f y) (f x)"
using pairwiseD [OF ‹pairwise coprime (f ` insert x A)›]
by auto
qed
from insert.hyps have "prod f (insert x A) = prod f A * f x" by simp
also have "totient … = totient (prod f A) * totient (f x)"
using insert.hyps insert.prems by (intro totient_mult_coprime *)
also have "totient (prod f A) = (∏a∈A. totient (f a))"
using insert.prems by (intro insert.IH) (auto dest: pairwise_subset)
also from insert.hyps have "… * totient (f x) = (∏a∈insert x A. totient (f a))" by simp
finally show ?case .
qed simp_all
lemma prime_power_eq_imp_eq:
fixes p q :: "'a :: factorial_semiring"
assumes "prime p" "prime q" "m > 0"
assumes "p ^ m = q ^ n"
shows "p = q"
proof (rule ccontr)
assume pq: "p ≠ q"
from assms have "m = multiplicity p (p ^ m)"
by (subst multiplicity_prime_power) auto
also note ‹p ^ m = q ^ n›
also from assms pq have "multiplicity p (q ^ n) = 0"
by (subst multiplicity_distinct_prime_power) auto
finally show False using ‹m > 0› by simp
qed
lemma totient_formula1:
assumes "n > 0"
shows "totient n = (∏p∈prime_factors n. p ^ (multiplicity p n - 1) * (p - 1))"
proof -
from assms have "n = (∏p∈prime_factors n. p ^ multiplicity p n)"
by (rule prime_factorization_nat)
also have "totient … = (∏x∈prime_factors n. totient (x ^ multiplicity x n))"
proof (rule totient_prod_coprime)
show "pairwise coprime ((λp. p ^ multiplicity p n) ` prime_factors n)"
proof (rule pairwiseI, clarify)
fix p q assume *: "p ∈# prime_factorization n" "q ∈# prime_factorization n"
"p ^ multiplicity p n ≠ q ^ multiplicity q n"
then have "multiplicity p n > 0" "multiplicity q n > 0"
by (simp_all add: prime_factors_multiplicity)
with * primes_coprime [of p q] show "coprime (p ^ multiplicity p n) (q ^ multiplicity q n)"
by auto
qed
next
show "inj_on (λp. p ^ multiplicity p n) (prime_factors n)"
proof
fix p q assume pq: "p ∈# prime_factorization n" "q ∈# prime_factorization n"
"p ^ multiplicity p n = q ^ multiplicity q n"
from assms and pq have "prime p" "prime q" "multiplicity p n > 0"
by (simp_all add: prime_factors_multiplicity)
from prime_power_eq_imp_eq[OF this pq(3)] show "p = q" .
qed
qed
also have "… = (∏p∈prime_factors n. p ^ (multiplicity p n - 1) * (p - 1))"
by (intro prod.cong refl totient_prime_power) (auto simp: prime_factors_multiplicity)
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma totient_dvd:
assumes "m dvd n"
shows "totient m dvd totient n"
proof (cases "m = 0 ∨ n = 0")
case False
let ?M = "λp m :: nat. multiplicity p m - 1"
have "(∏p∈prime_factors m. p ^ ?M p m * (p - 1)) dvd
(∏p∈prime_factors n. p ^ ?M p n * (p - 1))" using assms False
by (intro prod_dvd_prod_subset2 mult_dvd_mono dvd_refl le_imp_power_dvd diff_le_mono
dvd_prime_factors dvd_imp_multiplicity_le) auto
with False show ?thesis by (simp add: totient_formula1)
qed (insert assms, auto)
lemma totient_dvd_mono:
assumes "m dvd n" "n > 0"
shows "totient m ≤ totient n"
by (cases "m = 0") (insert assms, auto intro: dvd_imp_le totient_dvd)
lemma prime_factors_power: "n > 0 ⟹ prime_factors (x ^ n) = prime_factors x"
by (cases "x = 0"; cases "n = 0")
(auto simp: prime_factors_multiplicity prime_elem_multiplicity_power_distrib zero_power)
lemma totient_formula2:
"real (totient n) = real n * (∏p∈prime_factors n. 1 - 1 / real p)"
proof (cases "n = 0")
case False
have "real (totient n) = (∏p∈prime_factors n. real
(p ^ (multiplicity p n - 1) * (p - 1)))"
using False by (subst totient_formula1) simp_all
also have "… = (∏p∈prime_factors n. real (p ^ multiplicity p n) * (1 - 1 / real p))"
by (intro prod.cong refl) (auto simp add: field_simps prime_factors_multiplicity
prime_ge_Suc_0_nat of_nat_diff power_Suc [symmetric] simp del: power_Suc)
also have "… = real (∏p∈prime_factors n. p ^ multiplicity p n) *
(∏p∈prime_factors n. 1 - 1 / real p)" by (subst prod.distrib) auto
also have "(∏p∈prime_factors n. p ^ multiplicity p n) = n"
using False by (intro Primes.prime_factorization_nat [symmetric]) auto
finally show ?thesis .
qed auto
lemma totient_gcd: "totient (a * b) * totient (gcd a b) = totient a * totient b * gcd a b"
proof (cases "a = 0 ∨ b = 0")
case False
let ?P = "prime_factors :: nat ⇒ nat set"
have "real (totient a * totient b * gcd a b) = real (a * b * gcd a b) *
((∏p∈?P a. 1 - 1 / real p) * (∏p∈?P b. 1 - 1 / real p))"
by (simp add: totient_formula2)
also have "?P a = (?P a - ?P b) ∪ (?P a ∩ ?P b)" by auto
also have "(∏p∈…. 1 - 1 / real p) =
(∏p∈?P a - ?P b. 1 - 1 / real p) * (∏p∈?P a ∩ ?P b. 1 - 1 / real p)"
by (rule prod.union_disjoint) blast+
also have "… * (∏p∈?P b. 1 - 1 / real p) = (∏p∈?P a - ?P b. 1 - 1 / real p) *
(∏p∈?P b. 1 - 1 / real p) * (∏p∈?P a ∩ ?P b. 1 - 1 / real p)" (is "_ = ?A * _")
by (simp only: mult_ac)
also have "?A = (∏p∈?P a - ?P b ∪ ?P b. 1 - 1 / real p)"
by (rule prod.union_disjoint [symmetric]) blast+
also have "?P a - ?P b ∪ ?P b = ?P a ∪ ?P b" by blast
also have "real (a * b * gcd a b) * ((∏p∈…. 1 - 1 / real p) *
(∏p∈?P a ∩ ?P b. 1 - 1 / real p)) = real (totient (a * b) * totient (gcd a b))"
using False by (simp add: totient_formula2 prime_factors_product prime_factorization_gcd)
finally show ?thesis by (simp only: of_nat_eq_iff)
qed auto
lemma totient_mult: "totient (a * b) = totient a * totient b * gcd a b div totient (gcd a b)"
by (subst totient_gcd [symmetric]) simp
lemma of_nat_eq_1_iff: "of_nat x = (1 :: 'a :: {semiring_1, semiring_char_0}) ⟷ x = 1"
by (fact of_nat_eq_1_iff)
lemma odd_imp_coprime_nat:
assumes "odd (n::nat)"
shows "coprime n 2"
proof -
from assms obtain k where n: "n = Suc (2 * k)" by (auto elim!: oddE)
have "coprime (Suc (2 * k)) (2 * k)"
by (fact coprime_Suc_left_nat)
then show ?thesis using n
by simp
qed
lemma totient_double: "totient (2 * n) = (if even n then 2 * totient n else totient n)"
by (simp add: totient_mult ac_simps odd_imp_coprime_nat)
lemma totient_power_Suc: "totient (n ^ Suc m) = n ^ m * totient n"
proof (induction m arbitrary: n)
case (Suc m n)
have "totient (n ^ Suc (Suc m)) = totient (n * n ^ Suc m)" by simp
also have "… = n ^ Suc m * totient n"
using Suc.IH by (subst totient_mult) simp
finally show ?case .
qed simp_all
lemma totient_power: "m > 0 ⟹ totient (n ^ m) = n ^ (m - 1) * totient n"
using totient_power_Suc[of n "m - 1"] by (cases m) simp_all
lemma totient_gcd_lcm: "totient (gcd a b) * totient (lcm a b) = totient a * totient b"
proof (cases "a = 0 ∨ b = 0")
case False
let ?P = "prime_factors :: nat ⇒ nat set" and ?f = "λp::nat. 1 - 1 / real p"
have "real (totient (gcd a b) * totient (lcm a b)) = real (gcd a b * lcm a b) *
(prod ?f (?P a ∩ ?P b) * prod ?f (?P a ∪ ?P b))"
using False unfolding of_nat_mult
by (simp add: totient_formula2 prime_factorization_gcd prime_factorization_lcm)
also have "gcd a b * lcm a b = a * b" by simp
also have "?P a ∪ ?P b = (?P a - ?P a ∩ ?P b) ∪ ?P b" by blast
also have "prod ?f … = prod ?f (?P a - ?P a ∩ ?P b) * prod ?f (?P b)"
by (rule prod.union_disjoint) blast+
also have "prod ?f (?P a ∩ ?P b) * … =
prod ?f (?P a ∩ ?P b ∪ (?P a - ?P a ∩ ?P b)) * prod ?f (?P b)"
by (subst prod.union_disjoint) auto
also have "?P a ∩ ?P b ∪ (?P a - ?P a ∩ ?P b) = ?P a" by blast
also have "real (a * b) * (prod ?f (?P a) * prod ?f (?P b)) = real (totient a * totient b)"
using False by (simp add: totient_formula2)
finally show ?thesis by (simp only: of_nat_eq_iff)
qed auto
end