Return-Path: <john.harrison-request@uk.ac.cam.cl>
Delivery-Date: 
Received: from antares.mcs.anl.gov (no rfc931) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk 
          with SMTP (PP-6.4) outside ac.uk; Tue, 13 Apr 1993 16:57:54 +0100
Received: by antares.mcs.anl.gov id AA12105 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for qed-outgoing);
          Tue, 13 Apr 1993 10:25:55 -0500
Received: from lutra.mcs.anl.gov by antares.mcs.anl.gov with SMTP 
          id AA12095 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <qed@antares.mcs.anl.gov>);
          Tue, 13 Apr 1993 10:25:53 -0500
From: Bill McCune <mccune@gov.anl.mcs>
Received: by lutra.mcs.anl.gov (4.1/GeneV4) id AA01463;
          Tue, 13 Apr 93 10:25:52 CDT
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 93 10:25:52 CDT
Message-Id: <9304131525.AA01463@lutra.mcs.anl.gov>
To: qed@gov.anl.mcs
Subject: response to Meglicki
Sender: qed-owner@gov.anl.mcs
Precedence: bulk


(I'm sorry about my previous, misdirected message.)

Zdzislaw Gustav Meglicki writes: 

> The three issues mentioned above: knowledge data base, user interface,
> and language seem to me to be quite fundamental to the project.

I hope that there will be many implementations associated with QED,
with different types of knowledge bases, different user interfaces,
and written in different programming languages.  Of course there will
have to be (at some level) a common language for formulas, proofs, etc.,
but that seems like a small issue once the base logic is fixed.

It seems to me that the fundamental issues are the goals of the project
and the base logic.

  Bill McCune

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  |  William W. McCune              |    e-mail:  mccune@mcs.anl.gov  |
  |  MCS-221                        |    phone:   (708) 252-3065      |
  |  Argonne National Laboratory    |    FAX:     (708) 252-5986      |
  |  Argonne, IL  60439-4844        |                                 |
  |  U.S.A.                         |                                 |
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
