Return-Path: <John.Harrison-request@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Delivery-Date: 
Received: from leopard.cs.byu.edu (no rfc931) by nene.cl.cam.ac.uk 
          with SMTP (PP-6.5) outside ac.uk; Wed, 13 Sep 1995 09:05:49 +0100
Received: by leopard.cs.byu.edu (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA265017097;
          Tue, 12 Sep 1995 11:31:37 -0600
Sender: info-hol-request@lal.cs.byu.edu
Errors-To: info-hol-request@lal.cs.byu.edu
Precedence: list
Received: from tango.rahul.net by leopard.cs.byu.edu 
          with SMTP (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA264987095;
          Tue, 12 Sep 1995 11:31:35 -0600
Received: from bolero.rahul.net by tango.rahul.net with SMTP 
          id AA23611 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <info-hol@leopard.cs.byu.edu>);
          Tue, 12 Sep 1995 10:31:05 -0700
Received: from bedlam.rahul.net by bolero.rahul.net with SMTP 
          id AA04240 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <info-hol@leopard.cs.byu.edu>);
          Tue, 12 Sep 1995 10:30:36 -0700
Received: by bedlam.rahul.net 
          id m0ssZ8m-0005koC (Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.31);
          Tue, 12 Sep 95 10:29 PDT
Message-Id: <m0ssZ8m-0005koC@bedlam.rahul.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 95 10:29 PDT
From: bhogan@bedlam.rahul.net (Bill Hogan)
To: info-hol@leopard.cs.byu.edu
Subject: SUNYSB njsml-93 & Linux & hol-90.7 & CAML
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII


  Hello.

  I want to try to compile hol-90.7 on Linux using SUNYSB njsml-93.

  I did not have any problems building SUNYSB njsml-93 on Linux about
a year ago but this time it was no go.

  This time, `makeml-linux' went got this far and then stopped:

----------------------- quote ---------------------------

 ...

[Loading boot/overloads.sml]
structure Overloads : ...
Go for it
-
[Major collection... 55% used (3662460/6603984), 1580 msec]

[Decreasing heap to 10792k]

[Major collection... 98% used (3638384/3683620), 1600 msec]

uncaught exception Io "exportML "sml": Bad address"
--------------------------- unquote -----------------------


   Who was it said "Go for it"?

   Is anyone actively working on njsml-93 any more?

   Or is CAML where it's at these days?

   Is it possible to compile HOL 90 on CAML?

   Thank you.

   Bill
