Return-Path: <John.Harrison-request@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Delivery-Date: 
Received: from leopard.cs.byu.edu (no rfc931) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk 
          with SMTP (PP-6.5) outside ac.uk; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 21:51:34 +0100
Received: by leopard.cs.byu.edu (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA084050172;
          Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:29:32 -0600
Sender: info-hol-request@lal.cs.byu.edu
Errors-To: info-hol-request@lal.cs.byu.edu
Precedence: list
Received: from electra.cc.umanitoba.ca by leopard.cs.byu.edu 
          with ESMTP (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA084020169;
          Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:29:29 -0600
Received: from eeserv.ee.umanitoba.ca (eeserv.ee.umanitoba.ca [130.179.8.1]) 
          by electra.cc.umanitoba.ca (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA20838 
          for <info-hol@lal.cs.byu.edu>; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 12:30:38 -0500
Received: from wine by eeserv.ee.umanitoba.ca (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id MAA00754;
          Wed, 12 Jul 1995 12:30:10 -0500
From: rahard@ee.umanitoba.ca (Budi Rahardjo)
Received: by wine (5.x/25-eef) id AA22212; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 12:28:20 -0500
Message-Id: <9507121728.AA22212@wine>
Subject: Future of HOL
To: info-hol@leopard.cs.byu.edu
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 12:28:19 -0500 (CDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Phil Windley:
...
> HOL is just to hard for the non-expert to use and its time we did
> something about it.  If we don't, the world is going to be using PVS or
> something else like it.  Maybe we don't care...but I, for one, happen to
> think that the HOL architecture has some very nice features that I wouldn't
> want to give up.

YES! Being a non-expert, the simpler HOL is the better.
How do I learn practical HOL techniques and tricks?
For example, I'd like to know how you guys interact with HOL.
With emacs? screen? or windowing? others?
How do I manage HOL sessions? 
How do I stop a session (e.g. too tired) and resume the next day/week?
Is there a better HOL "shell" (e.g. use C-p to execute previous command)?
e GRIND_TAC;; ?
Would these issues be considered in HOL-2000?

About PVS, I am tempted to use PVS. In fact, I just downloaded PVS
documentations. I really want to stay with HOL, though.

Thanks for listening to my rambling...
-- budi
-- 
Budi Rahardjo
<rahard@ee.umanitoba.ca>                 <Budi_Rahardjo@UManitoba.CA>
Electrical and Computer Engineering - University of Manitoba - Canada
