Return-Path: <John.Harrison-request@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Delivery-Date: 
Received: from cs.uidaho.edu (actually ted.cs.uidaho.edu !OR! info-hol-request@cs.uidaho.edu) 
          by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk with SMTP (PP-6.5) outside ac.uk;
          Fri, 16 Jul 1993 20:08:24 +0100
Received: by cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/2.0) id AA18513; Fri, 16 Jul 93 11:55:39 -0700
Sender: info-hol-request@cs.uidaho.edu
Errors-To: info-hol-request@cs.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Received: from leopard.cs.uidaho.edu by cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/2.0) id AA18505;
          Fri, 16 Jul 93 11:55:29 -0700
Received: from [129.215.160.108] by leopard.cs.uidaho.edu (16.7/1.34) 
          id AA27078; Fri, 16 Jul 93 06:53:43 -0700
Received: from rough.dcs.ed.ac.uk by dcs.ed.ac.uk id aa21975;
          16 Jul 93 14:28 BST
Message-Id: <19481.9307161328@rough.dcs.ed.ac.uk>
Received: from mikef.localhost.dcs.ed.ac.uk by rough.dcs.ed.ac.uk;
          Fri, 16 Jul 93 14:28:21 +0100
To: info-hol@cs.uidaho.edu, Konrad Slind <slind@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
Subject: Re: HOL portability
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 24 Jun 93 22:08:21 +0100." <93Jun24.220822met_dst.8081@sunbroy14.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 93 14:28:20 +0100
From: Michael Fourman <mikef@dcs.ed.ac.uk>

> bloody difficult language. In my opinion, Dave Matthews has not received
> the credit he deserves for the PolyML compiler; it is a fine piece of

Was this intended to be a criticism of AHL? It could be read as one. We
work closely with Dave and chose to use his compiler because we needed
a reliable implementation vehicle for LAMBDA. We have undertaken to  
commercialise the compiler precisely because we appreciate and value his 
achievement.

For those who may be interested, some of Dave's papers on Poly/ML are
available as a technical report "Papers on Poly/ML" from Cambridge.

Mike
