Return-Path: Delivery-Date: Received: from ted.cs.uidaho.edu (no rfc931) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk with SMTP (PP-6.5) outside ac.uk; Tue, 18 May 1993 17:15:51 +0100 Received: by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA27075; Tue, 18 May 93 09:05:25 -0700 Sender: info-hol-request@ted.cs.uidaho.edu Errors-To: info-hol-request@ted.cs.uidaho.edu Precedence: bulk Received: from atc.boeing.com by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA27070; Tue, 18 May 93 09:05:21 -0700 Received: by atc.boeing.com (5.57) id AA00934; Tue, 18 May 93 09:09:38 -0700 Received: from lilith.bcs.eca by espresso.rt.cs.boeing.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA23866; Tue, 18 May 93 09:03:30 PDT Date: Tue, 18 May 93 09:03:30 PDT From: mjhealy@espresso.rt.cs.boeing.com (Michael J. Healy \(206\) 865-3123) Message-Id: <9305181603.AA23866@espresso.rt.cs.boeing.com> To: info-hol@ted.cs.uidaho.edu Subject: Re Emacs/HOL interface Cc: kew@atc.boeing.com, mjhealy@espresso.rt.cs.boeing.com I posted the same problem Geoffrey Hird had some time ago, but didn't get a response. I'm reading through my accumulated email now, hoping somebody out there knows what to do about the message writing to process: no more processes, hol Thanks for the clue, Geoffrey.