Return-Path: <John.Harrison-request@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Delivery-Date: 
Received: from ted.cs.uidaho.edu (no rfc931) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk 
          with SMTP (PP-6.5) outside ac.uk; Tue, 11 May 1993 07:08:18 +0100
Received: by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA08802;
          Mon, 10 May 93 22:58:50 -0700
Sender: info-hol-request@ted.cs.uidaho.edu
Errors-To: info-hol-request@ted.cs.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Received: from grolsch.cs.ubc.ca by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA08797;
          Mon, 10 May 93 22:58:43 -0700
Received: by grolsch.cs.ubc.ca id AA26991 (5.65c/IDA-1.3.5 
          for info-hol@ted.cs.uidaho.edu); Mon, 10 May 1993 22:58:47 -0700
Date: 10 May 93 22:58 -0700
From: Jeffrey Joyce <joyce@cs.ubc.ca>
To: info-hol <info-hol@ted.cs.uidaho.edu>
Message-Id: <6779*joyce@cs.ubc.ca>
Subject: UK interim defence procurement standard 00-55

Can anyone offer some up-to-date information on the status of 
UK interim defence procurement standard 00-55 ?  (for instance,
is it still "interim" ?).  

Also, does anyone know of other similar (proposed) industry
or government standards requiring the use of formal methods ?

Thanks in advance,

   - Jeff