Return-Path: <John.Harrison-request@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Delivery-Date: 
Received: from ted.cs.uidaho.edu (no rfc931) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk 
          with SMTP (PP-6.5) outside ac.uk; Wed, 21 Apr 1993 08:33:08 +0100
Received: by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA19313;
          Wed, 21 Apr 93 00:20:59 -0700
Sender: info-hol-request@ted.cs.uidaho.edu
Errors-To: info-hol-request@ted.cs.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Received: from swan.cl.cam.ac.uk by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA19308;
          Wed, 21 Apr 93 00:20:48 -0700
Received: from albatross.cl.cam.ac.uk (user mjcg (rfc931)) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk 
          with SMTP (PP-6.5) to cl; Wed, 21 Apr 1993 08:20:39 +0100
Received: by albatross.cl.cam.ac.uk (4.1/SMI-3.0DEV3) id AA03146;
          Wed, 21 Apr 93 08:20:34 BST
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 93 08:20:34 BST
From: Mike.Gordon@cl.cam.ac.uk
Message-Id: <9304210720.AA03146@albatross.cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: coe@panther.cs.uidaho.edu
Cc: info-hol@ted.cs.uidaho.edu
In-Reply-To: Mike Coe's message of Tue, 20 Apr 93 20:24:22 PDT <199304210324.AA23344@panther.cs.uidaho.edu>
Subject: ml in HOL


The original denotatational semantics of a predecessor of Classic ML
(namely the ML of Edinburgh LCF) existed on a whiteboard at Edinburgh
for some years during the 1970s .. but, alas, never got written down.
From what I recall it was a fairly routine continuation based
semantics.

Mike

