Return-Path: <john.harrison-request@uk.ac.cam.cl>
Delivery-Date: 
Received: from ted.cs.uidaho.edu (no rfc931) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk 
          with SMTP (PP-6.4) outside ac.uk; Tue, 23 Mar 1993 17:10:04 +0000
Received: by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA12257;
          Tue, 23 Mar 93 08:50:07 -0800
Sender: info-hol-request@edu.uidaho.cs.ted
Errors-To: info-hol-request@edu.uidaho.cs.ted
Precedence: bulk
Received: from air52.larc.nasa.gov by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA12252;
          Tue, 23 Mar 93 08:50:00 -0800
Received: by air52.larc.nasa.gov (5.65.1/lanleaf2.4) id AA04015;
          Tue, 23 Mar 93 11:50:12 -0500
Message-Id: <9303231650.AA04015@air52.larc.nasa.gov>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 93 11:50:12 -0500
From: Victor "A." Carreno <vac@gov.nasa.larc.air16>
To: shb@com.oracorp
Subject: Re: Uncurried hol90.5 define_type constructors
In-Reply-To: Mail from 'shb@oracorp.com' dated: Tue, 23 Mar 93 10:09:58 EST
Cc: info-hol@edu.uidaho.cs.ted


> I sent this note out earlier, but haven't seen it yet on our local rn
> version of info-hol, so there might be a problem.  I've also added
> another question.

I received your first posting.

I never received my last posting to info-hol (regarding continuum and
descrete representations). Every body else seems to have gotten it. I have
concluded, after missing a few other postings, that the problem is site
dependent. I have complained to the system administrator. They test the
system, it works and say "see, it is working".

Victor.

