Return-Path: Delivery-Date: Received: from ted.cs.uidaho.edu (no rfc931) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk with SMTP (PP-6.4) outside ac.uk; Tue, 23 Mar 1993 14:40:01 +0000 Received: by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA11820; Tue, 23 Mar 93 06:25:29 -0800 Sender: info-hol-request@edu.uidaho.cs.ted Errors-To: info-hol-request@edu.uidaho.cs.ted Precedence: bulk Received: from scylla.oracorp.com by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA11815; Tue, 23 Mar 93 06:25:18 -0800 Received: from sparta.oracorp.com by oracorp.com (4.1/2.1-ORA Corporation) id AA02459; Tue, 23 Mar 93 09:24:46 EST Date: Tue, 23 Mar 93 09:24:43 EST From: shb@com.oracorp Received: by sparta.oracorp.com (4.1/1.3-ORA Corporation) id AA01169; Tue, 23 Mar 93 09:24:43 EST Message-Id: <9303231424.AA01169@sparta.oracorp.com> To: info-hol@edu.uidaho.cs.ted Subject: Hol90.5 define_type question Is there any way to get the hol90.5 version of define_type to define a concrete recursive type with a constructor whose argument type is a pair or other tuple? In hol 88 one says "foo num num" to get a Curried constructor, and says "foo num#num" to get an un-Curried one. In hol90.5, "foo of num # num" and "foo of (num # num)" both give a Curried constructor. Steve Brackin ORA