Return-Path: Delivery-Date: Received: from ted.cs.uidaho.edu (no rfc931) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk with SMTP (PP-6.4) outside ac.uk; Wed, 3 Mar 1993 16:53:29 +0000 Received: by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA12679; Wed, 3 Mar 93 08:35:18 -0800 Sender: info-hol-request@edu.uidaho.cs.ted Errors-To: info-hol-request@edu.uidaho.cs.ted Precedence: bulk Received: from engr.uark.edu by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA12674; Wed, 3 Mar 93 08:35:12 -0800 Received: from mozart.uark.edu by engr.uark.edu with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0nTwNk-0007SgC; Wed, 3 Mar 93 10:33 CST Received: by mozart.uark.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA00648; Wed, 3 Mar 93 10:33:44 CST Date: Wed, 3 Mar 93 10:33:44 CST From: peters@edu.uark.mozart (James Peters) Message-Id: <9303031633.AA00648@mozart.uark.edu> To: info-hol@edu.uidaho.cs.ted Subject: extracting code To hol90/hol88 researchers: I am wondering if work is being done on the problem of extracting code from hol (hol90 or hol88) proofs. I am hoping someone might be developing a version of hol (or a tool) similar to nuprl, which produces a lambda term during a nuprl proof. Jim