Return-Path: Delivery-Date: Received: from ted.cs.uidaho.edu (no rfc931) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk with SMTP (PP-6.4); Fri, 22 Jan 1993 11:49:00 +0000 Received: by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA21678; Fri, 22 Jan 93 03:38:16 -0800 Sender: info-hol-request@edu.uidaho.cs.ted Errors-To: info-hol-request@edu.uidaho.cs.ted Precedence: bulk Received: from ganymede.inmos.co.uk by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA21673; Fri, 22 Jan 93 03:38:03 -0800 Received: from frogland.inmos.co.uk by ganymede.inmos.co.uk; Fri, 22 Jan 93 11:37:31 GMT From: David Shepherd Message-Id: <2720.9301221137@frogland.inmos.co.uk> Subject: Re: Benchmarks, again! To: info-hol@edu.uidaho.cs.ted (info-hol mailing list) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 11:37:55 +0000 (GMT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL20] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 585 If anyone intends sending me the benchmark log from a KCL/AKCL system, can you also add to the info whether or not you are using John van Tassels allocation directives and if so what values you are using as IK gather that this too has a significant performance effect. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- david shepherd: des@inmos.co.uk tel: 0454-616616 x 625 inmos ltd, 1000 aztec west, almondsbury, bristol, bs12 4sq Life doesn't imitate art, it imitates bad television - Husbands and Wives