Return-Path: Delivery-Date: Received: from ted.cs.uidaho.edu (no rfc931) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk with SMTP (PP-6.4); Thu, 14 Jan 1993 17:52:06 +0000 Received: by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA28888; Thu, 14 Jan 93 09:40:08 -0800 Sender: info-hol-request@edu.uidaho.cs.ted Errors-To: info-hol-request@edu.uidaho.cs.ted Precedence: bulk Received: from panther.cs.uidaho.edu by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA28883; Thu, 14 Jan 93 09:40:04 -0800 Received: from localhost by panther.cs.uidaho.edu with SMTP id AA06241 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for info-hol@cs.uidaho.edu); Thu, 14 Jan 1993 09:46:18 -0800 Message-Id: <199301141746.AA06241@panther.cs.uidaho.edu> To: info-hol@edu.uidaho.cs.ted Subject: CPU or USER bound? Date: Thu, 14 Jan 93 09:46:13 -0800 From: Phil Windley X-Mts: smtp As I was reading Konrad's posting about the USER bound state of HOL proofs, I was watching a proof of mine click over 60 CPU minutes on a DECStation 5000. There are still lots of interesting proofs that are CPU bound. --phil--