Return-Path: Delivery-Date: Received: from ted.cs.uidaho.edu (no rfc931) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk with SMTP (PP-6.4); Wed, 13 Jan 1993 08:14:51 +0000 Received: by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA25422; Wed, 13 Jan 93 00:03:41 -0800 Sender: info-hol-request@edu.uidaho.cs.ted Errors-To: info-hol-request@edu.uidaho.cs.ted Precedence: bulk Received: from swan.cl.cam.ac.uk by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA25417; Wed, 13 Jan 93 00:03:34 -0800 Received: from guillemot.cl.cam.ac.uk (user tfm (rfc931)) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk with SMTP (PP-6.4) to cl; Wed, 13 Jan 1993 08:02:49 +0000 To: Konrad Slind Cc: info-hol@edu.uidaho.cs.ted, Tom.Melham@uk.ac.cam.cl Subject: Re: BETA_CONV In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 13 Jan 93 00:05:52 +0100. <93Jan13.000602met.8121@sunbroy14.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 93 08:02:43 +0000 From: Tom Melham Message-Id: <"swan.cl.ca.708:13.01.93.08.02.57"@cl.cam.ac.uk> > ... Take the library of sets for example: it takes hol90 approx. 45 > seconds to prove all the theorems in the library. How long did it take > to write the proofs? Much longer than 45 seconds, but not as long as it took to write the manual! Tom