Return-Path: <john.harrison-request@uk.ac.cam.cl>
Delivery-Date: 
Received: from ted.cs.uidaho.edu by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk with SMTP (PP-6.2);
          Thu, 3 Sep 1992 10:15:44 +0100
Received: by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA14519;
          Thu, 3 Sep 92 02:06:33 -0700
Sender: info-hol-request@edu.uidaho.cs.ted
Errors-To: info-hol-request@edu.uidaho.cs.ted
Precedence: bulk
Received: from [192.100.78.20] by ted.cs.uidaho.edu (16.6/1.34) id AA14514;
          Thu, 3 Sep 92 02:06:22 -0700
Received: from UKACRL.BITNET by ib.rl.ac.uk (IBM VM SMTP V2R1) with BSMTP 
          id 0021; Thu, 03 Sep 92 10:06:03 BST
Received: from RL.IB by UKACRL.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 3059;
          Thu, 03 Sep 92 10:05:59 BST
Received: from RL.IB by UK.AC.RL.IB (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 4799;
          Thu, 03 Sep 92 10:05:57 BST
Via: UK.AC.ED.CASTLE; 3 SEP 92 10:05:03 BST
From: D MacKenzie <ekja03%castle.ed.ac.uk@uk.ac.rl.ib>
Subject: 'Sociology of proof' job
To: info-hol@edu.uidaho.cs.ted
Organisation: Edinburgh University
Telephone: 031 650 3980 (secy. on 650 4000)
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 92 10:03:55 GMT
Message-Id: <9209031004.aa29399@castle.ed.ac.uk>

ADVANCE NOTICE OF POSSIBLE RESEARCH POST IN SOCIOLOGY OF
MATHEMATICAL PROOF

Donald MacKenzie (Department of Sociology, University of Edinburgh) and
Alan Bundy (Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh) expect to advertise over
the next few weeks for a postdoctoral Research Fellow.   The post will be
on their project 'Studies in the Sociology of Proof', which is being funded
by the Economic and Social Research Council.

'Sociology of proof' refers to social factors (such as, for example,
disciplinary background) underpinning different notions of what kind of
mathematical argument constitutes a proof.   In particular, we will be
examining issues raised by the use of computers in the construction of
proofs.

Topics to be studied include:
- the debate over proofs of correctness of programs
- different evaluations of the Appel/Haken proof of the four colour
conjecture
- possible sources of future controversy about the soundness of the
product of automated theorem provers.

For an example of the kind of topic we want to address, see D. MacKenzie,
'The Fangs of the VIPER', Nature, vol. 352 (8 August 1991), 467-68.

As well as examination of published literature, the research will involve
several dozen interviews (primarily with mathematicians and computer
scientists) in Britain and the U.S.

The post would require:

 EITHER a relevant scientific background (e.g. in mathematics, computer
science, or artificial intelligence; and ideally, but not necessarily, with
experience of automated theorem proving) together with:
(a) an interest in the social, philosophical and even political issues that
surround proof; and
(b) a willingness to learn interview skills.

OR a social science background (ideally, but not necessarily, in the
sociology of scientific knowledge) together with the ability and
willingness to come to grips with the technical material involved.

It is anticipated that the job will begin on 1 November 1992 for twenty
months.    The first six months are intended primarily as a training period
in which necessary skills can be learnt.     It is expected that the
appointment will be on the 1A research scale, with placement according
to age and experience up to a maximum of point 9 (17,827 pounds per
annum - under review).

Those wishing to receive full details of the post when they become
available should e-mail either D.MacKenzie@edinburgh.ac.uk or
bundy@edinburgh.ac.uk.

