Return-Path: <John.Harrison-request@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Delivery-Date: 
Received: from leopard.cs.byu.edu (no rfc931) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk 
          with SMTP (PP-6.5) outside ac.uk; Tue, 24 May 1994 13:11:31 +0100
Received: by leopard.cs.byu.edu (1.37.109.8/16.2) id AA02553;
          Tue, 24 May 1994 06:10:13 -0600
Sender: hol2000-request@lal.cs.byu.edu
Errors-To: hol2000-request@lal.cs.byu.edu
Precedence: bulk
Received: from jaguar.cs.byu.edu by leopard.cs.byu.edu 
          with SMTP (1.37.109.8/16.2) id AA02549;
          Tue, 24 May 1994 06:10:13 -0600
Received: from localhost by jaguar.cs.byu.edu (1.38.193.4/CS-Client) id AA29341;
          Tue, 24 May 1994 06:11:36 -0600
Message-Id: <9405241211.AA29341@jaguar.cs.byu.edu>
To: hol2000@leopard.cs.byu.edu
Subject: A plea for better subject lines
Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 06:11:36 -0600
From: Phil Windley <windley@lal.cs.byu.edu>


In the interest of being able to make sense of all of this chatter later
(like maybe years from now) when someone says: "Gee, someone mentioned that
once on hol2000 and had some good thoughts...." can I make a plea that we
try to edit subject lines to make them more meaningful?  

Every message on this list so far (except mine ;-) has had the subject line
of the original post about the list being silent even though only the first
and possibly the second had anything to do with that.  

OK, I'll get off my soapbox now.  

--phil--