Return-Path: <John.Harrison-request@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Delivery-Date: 
Received: from leopard.cs.byu.edu (no rfc931) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk 
          with SMTP (PP-6.5) outside ac.uk; Tue, 24 May 1994 05:30:56 +0100
Received: by leopard.cs.byu.edu (1.37.109.8/16.2) id AA29431;
          Mon, 23 May 1994 22:29:22 -0600
Sender: hol2000-request@lal.cs.byu.edu
Errors-To: hol2000-request@lal.cs.byu.edu
Precedence: bulk
Received: from itd0.dsto.gov.au by leopard.cs.byu.edu 
          with SMTP (1.37.109.8/16.2) id AA29427;
          Mon, 23 May 1994 22:29:06 -0600
Received: from tcs22.dsto.gov.au by itd0.dsto.gov.au 
          with SMTP (5.64+1.3.1+0.50/DSTO-1.0) id AA05303;
          Tue, 24 May 1994 13:58:48 +0930
Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 13:58:48 +0930
From: Jim Grundy <jug@itd.dsto.gov.au>
Message-Id: <9405240428.AA05303@itd0.dsto.gov.au>
To: hol2000@leopard.cs.byu.edu
Subject: RCS

Well this list seems very silent, or is it just me?

If its not just me and indeed there is no trafic on the hol2000 list 
then perhaps I can get the ball rolling with some light hearted baiting
of people by suggesting that whatever we do with hol2000 we should maintain
the source code with some form of revision control software like RCS. :-)

Jim Grundy