\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage{a4wide,parskip,times}

\begin{document}

%% Replace PAPERTITLE below with the paper title
\title{Paper Review Form: PAPERTITLE}
\maketitle


\section*{Paper Summary (no more than 250 words)}

\textsl{Provide a brief summary of the paper (3-5 sentences is usually
  enough). The aim is to demonstrate that you've read (and understood)
  the paper, so try to paraphrase and extract the essentials. At this
  stage you should aim to be objective; later sections allow for your
  own opinion.}
%% Type your text below


\section*{Answer the following (no more than 750 words in total)} 

\subsection*{The Problem} 
\textsl{What is the problem? Why is it important? What is previous
  work insufficient (or Why has the problem not been solved before,
  e.g. it's a new problem the authors have identified).  This is your
  take on what the authors say in the paper (so again should be fairly
  objective). If the paper doesn't seem to tackle a particular
  problem, then focus on their primary motivation for the work. 1-2
  sentences for each of the three questions is probably sufficient.}
%% Type your text below




\subsection*{The Solution (or Approach)} 
\textsl{What is their approach/solution? How does it solve the
  problem? How is the solution unique and/or innovative (if it is)?
  What are the details? Once more you should use the paper itself as
  the source to help you answer these questions-- but, as in previous
  parts, please do not just copy sections from the paper. Instead you
  should focus on paraphrasing / synopsising, and extracting the
  essential details. Depending on the paper, you'll probably need 5-10
  sentences here.}
%% Type your text below




\subsection*{Evaluation} 
\textsl{How do they evaluation their solution? What questions do they
  set out to answer? What does the evaluation stay about the strengths 
and weaknesses of their system? What are the strengths and weaknesses 
of the evaluation itself do you think? A total of 3-4 sentences should
suffice here -- we're looking for highlights, not a point by point 
reproduction of the evaluation section(s). Note that, rarely, 
systems papers may not have any evaluation: if this is the case, 
write 'N/A' below.}
%% Type your text below




\subsection*{What you you think?} 
\textsl{This is the fun part! Here you get to make a judgement on the
  paper (both the work and the paper itself). Do you think it's a good
  idea? A bad one? Why? Are the specific things that annoyed you? Or
  that you thought were cool? Or cool-but-flawed? Aim to construct an
  argument here which will convince others of your opinion. You must
  have at least 3 sentences here, but feel free to write as much as 
  you like (subject to the overall word limit).}
%% Type your text below




\subsection*{Questions for the Authors}
\textsl{Imagine you're attending a talk about this paper given by 
one of the authors. List at least 2 questions that you would like 
to ask. These should ideally be specific to the paper / research.}
%% Type your text below






\end{document}
